The Stanford Law Review is a legal publication run by Stanford Law School students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary.

2024年5月14日 · Prof. Kim Forde-Mazrui of the University of Virginia responds to Sonja Starr’s print Article, The Magnet School Wars and the Future of Colorblindness.Forde-Mazrui argues that even if courts adopt the “ends-colorblindness” framework described by Starr, “alternative action” policies meant to promote diversity may still be constitutionally permissible.

President Gregory D. Schwartz . Online Editor-In-Chief Salma Abdelrahman . Online Managing Editors Kevin K. Wang Angela Xiao Online Editors Aidan J. Brice

In recent months, California and Washington have enacted statutes forbidding private corporations in their states from cooperating with other states

The Stanford Law Review was organized in 1948.Warren Christopher, the Law Review’s first President, opened Volume 1 with a description of the Law Review’s aims:. A dual goal is set for the Review: to publish a journal of worth to lawyers and to provide an educational experience of value to students.Fortunately, these goals are complementary. ...

* Max M. S c hanzenba c h is the Seigle Family Professor of Law, Northwestern University. Robert H. Sitkoff is the John L. Gray Professor of Law, Harvard University. The authors thank Cliff Asness, Lucian Beb c huk, Tom Brennan, John Campbell, Einer Elhauge, Melanie Fein, Allen Ferrell, Ronald Gilson, Jeffrey Gordon, Oliver Hart, J.B. Heaton, Howell Jackson, Kim Kamin, Louis Kaplow, John ...

2024年1月22日 · Now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v.Wade and Planned Parenthood v.Casey, the movement for abortion rights and access finds itself in uncharted territory, and the stakes could not be higher.For abortion rights defenders, this new, post-Roe playing field means adapting their strategy and mindset to confront a new environment without a tether to federal constitutional protection.

President Samuel T. Ward-Packard . Online Editor-in-Chief Carly Grimes . Senior Development Editor Maria Elizabeth Trujillo . History Editor Magdalene Zier

The Supreme Court’s recent decision striking down the use of race-based classifications in university admissions reflects its growing commitment to the concept of “colorblindness,” which has implications well beyond education.

In the wake of Dobbs v.Jackson Women’s Health Organization, legal scholars have proposed countless innovative strategies to secure reproductive autonomy, largely by circumventing the holding in Dobbs.This Note, however, takes a different approach. Rather than concluding that Dobbs has entirely foreclosed the pathway to constitutional abortion access, this Note considers the marginal case of ...